http://tinyurl.com/bcydvk (and links) to me which shows that questions about the 1962 Eskimo Curlew photos have been asked before, and largely answered. It looks as though the color photo was assembled for aesthetic purposes.
(c) Don Bleitz - it says the photographs can be reproduced for educational purposes, so please learn something or I'm in the crapand here
(c) Don Bleitz - it says the photographs can be reproduced for educational purposes, so please learn something or I'm in the crap - if a joke's funny the first time, it's funny every time, don'tcha think?Again, above, one photo has been printed in reverse wrt to the other, but the bird is in what looks to be an identical pose in both shots. Just dirty rotten look for the photographer, I guess, but it just goes to show.
I've had this on the back burner for a while and like everyone else I came to the conclusion that these had to be real living birds photographed, as in fact the real living birds did exist and were seen by several top birders. Clearly others have gone to some trouble over it though. On my travels through the web I came across this photo of an Eskimo mount that was done as a prank - sorry I don't know who took this, so if you do, please let me know.
I think you'd tell by its unnatural bulgy eye and dishevelled coverts etc that this wasn't the real deal. I tried making it b+w and adding a bit of blur and noise in Photoshop, but it did only a little bit of good.
hey ho. Maybe 8 years on BOURC has poisoned my mind :-O :-O :-))
In Newtonhill today - weather, and lots of it.
The weather, the waves, the sea spray, the tattered Saltire. Welcome to Burns' Night! The only thing that could make this more Scottish would be a wee man pishing up against his own shed. A few birds, but I think we both know that they were the usuals. The Elsick Burn was in full spate, and there was a White-bellied Dipper flying up and down making weird zippy noises, looking for somewhere to eat.





